Each year we, at CMDR, look back at our client population seeking to uncover patterns, changes, and even trends. Clearly 2020 was a year like no other, a year that we hope never to replicate in its assault on individuals, families, businesses, and indeed the very social fabric of our nation.
As a mediation firm, we went remote on March 16th and have stayed remote throughout the year, offering zoom and teleconferencing options in place of in-person mediation. We miss seeing, really seeing, our clients; we miss all the many advantages of being able to be with, and work with, clients in person. However, admittedly with the onslaught of so many unimaginable developments affecting the way we live and do business, remote mediation offered an opportunity, even in a closed down world, to continue our mission of helping clients to devise creative approaches and reach settlements. We applaud the tenacity and inspired thinking of our 2020 clients, a clientele that in the midst of turmoil and uncertainty turned to a collaborative and rationale vehicle to reach agreement.
In summary, given the developments occurring in 2020, it is perhaps not surprising that business owners increasingly began to grapple with decisions surrounding the termination of a principal’s involvement with the business, due to retirement and death, as well as to confront the need for major changes in the structure and /or nature of the business enterprise, including modification of business models and modes of operation.
In summary, the Pandemic seemed to awaken in couples the need for action, particularly action that they had been delaying. In this way, separated couples now decided to divorce; couples living together and thinking of separation, now decided to separate or divorce. Perhaps, life suddenly seemed too short or too tenuous to delay unrealized plans or ambitions.
In summary, some of the same issues that we have witnessed over the years continued to persist: will provisions that provided increased protection for one child were met with confusion, disappointment, and even anger of siblings; inheritances that required collaborative usage or decision making engendered disagreements and tension; and the care of aging parents raised questions of inequities in responsibility and “payment.” The Pandemic may have exacerbated disagreement and/or imposed new restrictions on movement and ability to pay, but the core issues remained essentially unchanged.